Beach user opinions and the development of a beach quality rating scale. Middle East Technical University, Ankara. Beach user opinions and beach ratings: A pilot study on the Turkish Aegean Coast. Morgan, R., Bursalioglu, B., Hapoglu-Balas, L., Jones, T.C., …zhan, E. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross Inc., Stroudsberg, PA. Environmental preferences: A critical analysis of some research methodologies. Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material. An informed model for the prediction of preference. Assessment of the environmental impact of high voltage power transmission lines. Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgements, J. Distance and scenic beauty: A nonmonotonic relationship. Landscape evaluation: A research project in East Sussex. Coastal landscape preference evaluation: A comparison among tourists in Greece. USDA Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ĭearden, P. Measuring landscape aesthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.ĭaniel, T.C. (ed.) Natural environments: studies in theoretical and applied analysis, pp. Appraising the objectivity of landscape dimensions.
Coastal recreation: aesthetics and ethics. Landscape preference metrics: An international comparison. The attractiveness of woodlands: perceptions of forest landowners in Massachusetts. (eds.) Perceiving environmental quality: research and applications, pp. Perceived quality of scenic and recreational environments: Some methodological issues. USDA Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Co.īrush, R.O. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-256. Modelling forest scenic beauty: concepts and application to Ponderosapine. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.īourassa, S.C. (eds.) Methods in environmental and behavioral research, pp. Who values what?: Audience reactions to coastal scenery. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.īanerjee, T. A reliability-based risk assessment model for coastal projects. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.īalas, C.E. Department of Geography Occasional Publication No. David Linton's contribution to landscape evaluation. Landscape evaluation: the theoretical vacuum. Guidelines for integrated management of coastal and marine areas. Bathing water quality in England and Wales-1993.
Coastal zone management: integrated policies. Official Journal of the European Community 19 (元1), pp. Council Directive of 8 December 1975 concerning the quality of bathing water, 76/160/EEC. It is proposed to use these scores for beach scenery/aesthetic quality in a novel, comprehensive beach rating system.Īnon. The findings contribute to management of coastal aesthetic resources by providing a quantitative evaluation scheme. Cloud cover at time of filming had a significant effect ( p=0.00) on scoring, so a correction was applied for final score calculation and ranking.
With both groups a strong preference was observed for undeveloped beaches over those where anthropogenic structures were prominent ( p=0.00), but beach commercialization level had an independent effect only on scores from the student group ( p=0.02). Wave height, number of people present on the beach and position on the final videotape did not have significant effects on mean scores generated by either group. Pembrokeshire 80%) to 6.1 (Trecco Bay, Porthcawl 31%). Pembrokeshire 80%) to 3.8 (Prestatyn, North Wales 19%), while scores of students ranged from 16.0 (Barafundle, S. Mean scores of coastal managers ranged from 16.1 (Broadhaven, S. Beaches were given a score from zero to 20 by a panel of 24 coastal managers (National Park and Heritage Coast Wardens, etc.) and 42 final year Degree or Master of Science students specializing in environmental sciences. 70 beaches in Wales, UK, were investigated with regard to the quality of beach scenery using video panoramas.
0 kommentar(er)
